Landmark IBC Ruling: Supreme Court Fortifies CoC's Commercial Wisdom in Bhushan Power Case

This landmark judgment significantly reinforces the foundational principles of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) by upholding the non-justiciable 'commercial wisdom' of the Committee of Creditors (CoC). It provides critical clarifications on the CoC's ongoing role post-resolution plan approval, the treatment of profits generated during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), and the finality of resolution plans even amidst external challenges like Enforcement Directorate actions. A pivotal decision for professionals in corporate finance, restructuring, and legal advisory, emphasizing certainty and efficiency in insolvency resolution.

Read the Full Article: Here

KALYANI TRANSCO VS M/S BHUSHAN POWER AND STEEL LIMITED AND OTHERS, decided on 26-09-2025

Other Supreme Court Decisions You Might Find Interesting:

Procedural Fairness Trumps Ineligibility in Teacher Reinstatement

This ruling highlights the Court's pragmatic approach in cases where procedural lapses by authorities lead to an individual's disadvantage. Despite initial ineligibility, the Court reinstated a teacher due to prolonged administrative processing and approval, emphasizing unique circumstances over rigid precedents. Professionals in HR and public administration should note the implications of administrative diligence.

Read the Full Article: Here

RAJESH KUMAR VS STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS., decided on 16-09-2025

SC Quashes 'Rape on Pretext of Marriage' FIR Citing Ulterior Motives

The Supreme Court reiterated its stance against the misuse of criminal provisions for personal vengeance, quashing an FIR for rape on the pretext of marriage. This decision underscores the judiciary's role in preventing the abuse of legal processes, particularly when allegations surface after counter-complaints. Relevant for legal practitioners navigating complex personal and criminal disputes.

Read the Full Article: Here

Surendra Khawse VS State of Madhya Pradesh & Anr., decided on 22-09-2025

Retiral Dues Not Leverage for Government Housing: SC Upholds Employee Rights

This judgment firmly establishes that retiral benefits are a fundamental right, not a discretionary bounty. The Court affirmed that government entities cannot arbitrarily withhold pension and gratuity as a leverage for non-vacated government housing, emphasizing the distinct nature of these entitlements. Crucial for public sector HR, finance, and legal departments.

Read the Full Article: Here

Panchayat & Rural Development Department & Ors. VS Santosh Kumar Shrivastava, decided on 22-09-2025

Balancing Liberty and Safety: SC Overturns High Court's Bail Revocation

The Supreme Court clarified the delicate balance between individual liberty and public safety in bail matters. Overturning a High Court's direct revocation, it emphasized that rather than outright cancellation, a reconsideration by the Sessions Court is often appropriate, especially when no new breach of conditions occurs. Insights for criminal law practitioners and judicial officers on bail jurisprudence.

Read the Full Article: Here

ABHIMANUE, ATHUL, SANAND, VISHNU, DHANEESH VS. STATE OF KERALA & ANR., decided on 22-09-2025

Murder Acquittal: SC Highlights Unreliable Evidence and High Bar for Proof

A reminder of the high bar for proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt, this ruling saw the acquittal of appellants in a murder case. The Court highlighted the unreliability of extra-judicial confessions to police and the need for robust, credible circumstantial evidence. Essential reading for criminal defense and prosecution alike.

Read the Full Article: Here

Nagamma @ Nagarathna & Ors. VS The State of Karnataka, decided on 22-09-2025

SARFAESI Act: Borrower's Redemption Right Extinguishes at Auction Notice Publication

This significant SARFAESI Act judgment clarifies that a borrower's right of redemption extinguishes upon the publication of an auction notice, not at a later stage. It reinforces the auction purchaser's rights and critiques the High Court's use of equitable principles to override statutory provisions. Crucial for banking, finance, and real estate professionals.

Read the Full Article: Here

M. RAJENDRAN & ORS. VS M/S KPK OILS AND PROTIENS INDIA PVT. LTD. & ORS., decided on 22-09-2025

Retrospective Promotion Ordered for Officer Facing Flawed Disciplinary Action

In a win for fair employment practices, the Supreme Court ordered retrospective promotion and full consequential benefits for an officer who faced delayed and flawed disciplinary proceedings. This ruling emphasizes the right to timely justice and rectifies the injustice of juniors being promoted ahead due to administrative dereliction. Key for HR departments and public sector service law.

Read the Full Article: Here

Jyotshna Singh VS State of Jharkhand & Ors., decided on 22-09-2025

Repeated Challenges to Loan Recovery Dismissed by SC

The Court dismissed repeated challenges to a SARFAESI recovery order, citing principles of public policy against vexatious litigation. It highlights the importance of finality in legal proceedings and the impermissibility of filing multiple appeals for the same cause without proper leave. A reminder for legal professionals on strategic litigation and procedural adherence.

Read the Full Article: Here

SATHEESH V.K. VS THE FEDERAL BANK LTD., decided on 23-09-2025

Airport Authority Export Cargo Handling Services Are Taxable, Rules SC

This judgment clarifies service tax liability for airport authorities, holding that services related to export cargo are taxable under the broader definition of 'taxable service,' despite specific exclusions in the 'cargo handling service' definition. Essential for logistics, import-export, and tax professionals to understand the scope of service tax.

Read the Full Article: Here

Airports Authority of India VS Commissioner of Service Tax, decided on 23-09-2025

SC Reins In High Court's Expansive Review in Judicial Recruitment

The Supreme Court reined in expansive judicial review, setting aside a High Court's decision to re-evaluate judicial officer recruitment results based on mere apprehension. This reinforces the limited scope of review jurisdiction and the need for demonstrable error, impacting administrative law and recruitment processes.

Read the Full Article: Here

High Court of Madhya Pradesh & Anr. VS Jyotsna Dohalia & Anr., decided on 23-09-2025

Colonial-Era Land Grant Rescission Upheld in Dadra and Nagar Haveli

This historical land dispute affirmed the rescission of colonial-era land grants in Dadra and Nagar Haveli due to non-compliance with cultivation conditions. The Court emphasized that statutory conditions cannot be waived and reversed lower court findings based on misreading of law. Relevant for property law, historical land rights, and administrative law.

Read the Full Article: Here

Divya ngnakumari Harisinh Parmar (Dead) and others VS Union of India and others, decided on 24-09-2025

'Pay and Recover' Rule Applied in Accident Case with Invalid Driver's License

In a ruling on motor accident compensation, the Court reiterated the 'pay and recover' principle. The insurance company was directed to pay compensation despite the driver's invalid license, retaining the right to recover the amount from the vehicle owner. Crucial for insurance claims, personal injury law, and vehicle owners.

Read the Full Article: Here

RAMA BAI VS M/S AMIT MINERALS THROUGH INCHARGE OFFICER/ COMPETENT OFFICER & ANRS., decided on 24-09-2025

Frivolous Misconduct Allegations Against Advocates Quashed by SC

This judgment quashed disciplinary proceedings against advocates, underscoring that complaints must be supported by "sufficient reasons to believe" misconduct occurred and a clear professional relationship with the complainant. It serves as a safeguard against frivolous complaints and abuse of the disciplinary mechanism for legal professionals.

Read the Full Article: Here

Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa VS Rajiv Nareshchandra Narula & Ors., decided on 24-09-2025

Arbitral Award Interest Calculation Must Adhere to Contractual Terms: SC

In an arbitration dispute, the Supreme Court clarified that where a Memorandum of Understanding specifies interest calculation, the arbitral award should adhere to those terms, precluding further claims for compound interest. This reinforces contractual sanctity in arbitration. Important for contract law, arbitration practitioners, and corporate finance.

Read the Full Article: Here

HLV LIMITED VS PBSAMP PROJECTS PVT. LTD., decided on 24-09-2025

SC Hikes Interest Rate for Delayed Property Refund to 18%

The Court enhanced the interest rate on a delayed property refund from 9% to 18% per annum, reflecting the builder's significant delay and conduct. This ruling serves as a strong signal to real estate developers regarding accountability for project delays and fair compensation to consumers. Critical for real estate, consumer law, and financial planning.

Read the Full Article: Here

RAJNESH SHARMA VS M/S. BUSINESS PARK TOWN PLANNERS LTD., decided on 24-09-2025

Criminal Proceedings from Civil Dispute Quashed as Abuse of Process

Reiterating the principle against criminalizing civil disputes, the Supreme Court quashed malicious criminal proceedings arising from a land dispute. It emphasized that criminal law should not be used as a tool for settling commercial scores. A significant decision for legal professionals dealing with civil and criminal overlap.

Read the Full Article: Here

ANUKUL SINGH VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR., decided on 24-09-2025

Dowry Harassment FIR Quashed: Vague Allegations Insufficient for Prosecution

The Court quashed an FIR in a dowry harassment case due to vague and omnibus allegations, reinforcing the need for specific details to prevent misuse of legal provisions. This ruling offers a safeguard for individuals facing generalized accusations in matrimonial disputes.

Read the Full Article: Here

SHOBHIT KUMAR MITTAL VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANOTHER, decided on 24-09-2025

Lack of Prima Facie Case Leads to Quashing of Criminal Proceedings

In another instance of preventing abuse of process, the Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings for cheating and criminal breach of trust stemming from a property sale agreement. The significant delay in complaint filing and absence of dishonest intent at the agreement's inception pointed to a civil nature of dispute. Important for corporate and criminal defense.

Read the Full Article: Here

ARSHAD NEYAZ KHAN VS STATE OF JHARKHAND & ANOTHER, decided on 24-09-2025

SC Strikes Down Rajasthan's Discriminatory Tax Exemption for Fly Ash Products

The Supreme Court struck down a Rajasthan tax exemption for in-state manufacturers of fly ash-based asbestos products, finding it discriminatory against out-of-state goods and violating Article 304(a) of the Constitution. This decision reinforces principles of free trade and non-discrimination in state taxation. Crucial for businesses involved in interstate trade and tax advisory.

Read the Full Article: Here

M/s. U.P. Asbestos Limited & M/s. Everest Industries Limited VS State of Rajasthan & Others, decided on 24-09-2025

Lecturer Reinstated: SC Rectifies Erroneous Age Limit Application

The Court ordered the reinstatement of a lecturer whose appointment was erroneously challenged based on the wrong set of age limit rules. This judgment emphasizes correct application of service rules and rectifies injustices arising from administrative errors. Relevant for educational institutions and public sector employment law.

Read the Full Article: Here

JYOTSNA DEVI VS THE STATE OF ASSAM & ORS., decided on 25-09-2025

Summary Suits: SC Upholds Procedural Mandate for Leave to Defend

This procedural ruling clarified that in summary suits, a defendant must apply for "leave to defend" before filing a reply to the summons for judgment. The Supreme Court emphasized that bypassing this step undermines the distinct expedited nature of summary suits under Order XXXVII CPC. Important for civil litigation practitioners.

Read the Full Article: Here

EXECUTIVE TRADING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED VS GROW WELL MERCANTILE PRIVATE LIMITED, decided on 25-09-2025

Power Purchase Dispute: SC Clarifies Liability for Electricity Diversion

A complex PPA dispute saw the Supreme Court modify previous rulings, holding Essar Power liable for fixed charges reimbursement and compensation for electricity diverted from GUVNL's share. The decision highlights proportional allocation and calculation methodologies in power agreements. Critical for energy law, utility companies, and contract management.

Read the Full Article: Here

Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited VS Essar Power Limited and another, decided on 25-09-2025

SC Quashes Illegal Auction of DDA Leased Property

The Supreme Court quashed an illegal auction of a DDA-leased property, which was mortgaged to a bank without DDA's consent and sold despite objections. The Bank was ordered to refund the auction purchaser. This stresses the importance of consent in property transactions and the enforceability of lease covenants. Relevant for banking, real estate, and property law.

Read the Full Article: Here

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS CORPORATION BANK & ORS., decided on 25-09-2025

Partnership Share Transfer Invalidated Due to Fabricated Documents

The Court set aside a partnership share transfer based on fabricated documents, emphasizing the appellate court's duty to re-appreciate evidence thoroughly. It also touched upon the validity of acts by an official receiver before insolvency annulment. Crucial for partnership law, insolvency practitioners, and civil litigation.

Read the Full Article: Here

SINGAMASETTY BHAGAVATH GUPTHA & ANR. VS ALLAM KARIBASAPPA (D) BY LRS. /ALLAM DODDABASAPPA (D) BY LRS. & ORS., decided on 25-09-2025

Cheque Bouncing Cases: SC Reinforces NI Act Presumptions, Issues Guidelines

In a significant ruling on cheque bouncing cases, the Supreme Court reversed an acquittal, reinforcing the strong presumptions under the NI Act. It clarified that once a cheque's execution is admitted, the onus shifts to the accused to rebut the presumption of a legally enforceable debt. Guidelines were also issued to expedite such cases. Vital for banking, finance, and commercial law.

Read the Full Article: Here

Sanjabij Tari VS Kishore S. Borcar & Anr., decided on 25-09-2025

Competition Law: SC Clarifies Notice Adequacy for Individual Penalties

The Supreme Court clarified that a separate show-cause notice for penalties on individuals under the Competition Act is not always mandated, finding the initial DG report and financial disclosure requests sufficient notice. This streamlines competition proceedings and reinforces the CCI's power to impose deterrent behavioral and monetary remedies on key decision-makers. Important for compliance officers and corporate legal teams.

Read the Full Article: Here

Competition Commission of India VS Kerala Film Exhibitors Federation & Ors., decided on 26-09-2025

Murder Acquittal Upheld: SC Emphasizes Insufficient and Unreliable Evidence

This judgment reaffirms that the standard of proof in criminal cases is high, upholding an acquittal in a murder case due to insufficient and unreliable circumstantial evidence. The Court highlighted flaws in 'last seen' testimony, forensic links, and the admissibility of CDRs without proper certification. A key reference for criminal law defense and prosecution.

Read the Full Article: Here

State of Rajasthan VS Bhanwar Singh Etc. Etc., decided on 26-09-2025

Vague Allegations Lead to Quashing of Dowry Harassment FIR Against In-Laws

The Supreme Court quashed an FIR against in-laws in a dowry harassment case, emphasizing that vague and general allegations, without specific details linking them to the accused, do not constitute a prima facie case. This ruling further protects individuals from unsubstantiated accusations in matrimonial disputes.

Read the Full Article: Here

SANJAY D. JAIN & ORS. VS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS., decided on 26-09-2025

Judicial Recruitment Eligibility: SC Directs Appointments as Exceptional Case

In an exceptional move, the Supreme Court directed the appointment of qualified judicial candidates despite eligibility disputes related to state-specific practice requirements. While not setting a precedent, it underscores judicial pragmatism in resolving recruitment deadlocks. Relevant for legal education, judicial recruitment, and administrative law.

Read the Full Article: Here

USHA KIRAN KSHATRI AND ORS. VS THE STATE OF TELANGANA & ORS., decided on 26-09-2025

Arbitral Award Set Aside: SC Cites Unilateral Waiver, Discriminatory Treatment

The Supreme Court affirmed the setting aside of an arbitral award, finding that the tribunal had exceeded its jurisdiction by unilaterally waiving contractual notices and demonstrating discriminatory treatment. This ruling reinforces the "public policy of India" and "fundamental policy of Indian law" as grounds for judicial interference in arbitration awards. Critical for arbitration law and contract management.

Read the Full Article: Here

SEPCO ELECTRIC POWER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION VS GMR KAMALANGA ENERGY LTD., decided on 26-09-2025

Triple Murder Conviction Reduced: Absence of Intent to Kill Crucial for SC

In a case of triple murder stemming from an agricultural dispute, the Supreme Court converted a Section 302 IPC conviction to Section 304 Part I IPC. The use of blunt sides of weapons and the context of a sudden quarrel indicated an absence of "intention to kill," reducing the culpability. Important for criminal law jurisprudence and evidence assessment.

Read the Full Article: Here

RAGHAV PRASHAD AND OTHERS VS STATE OF U.P., decided on 26-09-2025

Anti-Corruption Case: SC Upholds Quashing of FIR Due to Lack of Material Link

The Court upheld the quashing of an FIR against an accused in an anti-corruption case, finding no material connection beyond a "casual allegation" of a phone call. This reinforces the need for concrete evidence to proceed with criminal charges, preventing harassment based on weak links. Relevant for anti-corruption law and criminal defense.

Read the Full Article: Here

The State of Telangana Vs Jerusalem Mathai and Anr., decided on 26-09-2025

Paraplegic Victim Compensation Enhanced: SC Reassesses Income, Medical Expenses

The Supreme Court significantly enhanced compensation for a paraplegic motor accident victim, reassessing lost income based on academic prospects and allowing substantial future medical expenses. This judgment offers robust support for victims of severe injuries, highlighting a holistic approach to compensation. Important for personal injury law and insurance claims.

Read the Full Article: Here

Sharad Singh (Dead) Through LR. VS H. D. Narang & Anr., decided on 26-09-2025

Fatal Accident Claim Rejected: Unproven Accident and Vehicle Involvement

In a cautionary tale for accident claims, the Court affirmed the rejection of compensation where the accident itself and the involvement of the alleged vehicle remained unproven. Unexplained delays in FIR and inconsistent witness testimonies weakened the claim. Highlights the importance of credible evidence in motor accident claims.

Read the Full Article: Here

Rajamma & Ors. VS M/s. Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr., decided on 26-09-2025

Motor Accident Claim Survives to Legal Representatives, SC Clarifies

This judgment clarified that a claim for personal injury compensation in a motor accident survives to legal representatives upon the claimant's death, even if not directly caused by the accident. It also re-assessed compensation for a 100% disabled individual, considering future prospects and actual lifespan post-accident. Crucial for motor accident claims and estate planning.

Read the Full Article: Here

Dhannalal Alias Dhanraj (Dead) Thr. LRs. Vs Nasir Khan and Ors., decided on 26-09-2025

Partial Recovery from Vehicle Owner Allowed Despite Insurer's Lapses

Despite an insurance company's procedural lapses, the Supreme Court allowed partial recovery of compensation from a vehicle owner where the insurance policy was allegedly fraudulently altered. This 'pay and recover' principle applies with a nuanced approach, acknowledging underlying fraud while protecting victims. Important for insurance companies and vehicle owners.

Read the Full Article: Here

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. VS NARAYAN SINGH & ORS., decided on 26-09-2025

MV Act Claims: SC Rejects Application of Workmen's Compensation Parameters

The Court restored a higher compensation award for a motor accident victim, ruling that once a claim is made under the Motor Vehicles Act, it is impermissible for a higher court to apply parameters from the Workmen's Compensation Act. This clarifies the distinct legal frameworks for compensation. Essential for personal injury lawyers and insurance adjusters.

Read the Full Article: Here

MOHAMMED MASOOD VS THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR., decided on 26-09-2025