Featured Case: Apportionment of Coal Costs in Power Purchase Agreements

The Supreme Court's decision in Haryana Power Purchase Centre & Ors. v. GMR Kamalanga Energy Ltd. & Ors. provides crucial clarification on the apportionment of additional coal costs in Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs). This case offers valuable insights into the interpretation of PPAs and FSAs, and the standard of review for decisions by expert bodies like the CERC and APTEL. The ruling impacts how risk and costs are allocated in the energy sector.

Read the Full Article: Here

HARYANA POWER PURCHASE CENTRE (HPPC) AND OTHERS VS GMR KAMALANGA ENERGY LIMITED AND OTHERS, decided on 08-09-2025

Other Supreme Court Decisions You Might Find Interesting:

Review Jurisdiction and Coparcenary Rights under the Hindu Succession Act

Malleeswari vs K. Suguna and Another sheds light on the scope of review jurisdiction under the CPC and its interaction with the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005. The case clarifies the daughter's coparcenary rights in partition suits and offers guidance on the procedural aspects of amending preliminary decrees. This decision has significant implications for family law and property disputes.

Read the Full Article: Here

MALLEESWARI VS K. SUGUNA AND ANOTHER, decided on 08-09-2025