Featured Insights: The Supreme Court Declares 'Right to Walk' a Fundamental Right, Redefining Urban Mobility & Citizen Safety

In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court of India has unequivocally declared the 'right to walk' as a fundamental right under Part III of the Constitution. This pivotal ruling mandates urban and local authorities to proactively demarcate, construct, and maintain footpaths, prioritizing pedestrian safety over motorized vehicle movement. This judgment has profound implications for urban planning, infrastructure development, public policy, and the fundamental entitlements of every citizen. Professionals in real estate, urban development, law, and government administration should take note of this paradigm shift in urban governance and citizen-centric infrastructure design.

Read the Full Article: Here

MANIYAR ILIYAZ @ SHAIK RIYAZ & ANR. VS P. AYYAPPAN & ORS., decided on 19-06-2026

Other Critical Supreme Court Rulings Impacting Business & Law:

Injunctions & Judicial Discretion: SC Reaffirms Procedural Integrity in Mandatory Injunction Decrees

The Supreme Court recently underscored the limits of judicial discretion in civil remedies, ruling that courts cannot compel a plaintiff to accept monetary compensation in lieu of a mandatory injunction decree without their explicit consent or specific prayer for such relief. This decision reiterates the critical importance of procedural adherence, particularly Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, which mandates framing substantial questions of law in Second Appeals. Legal practitioners and property owners should note this reinforcement of the plaintiff's right to the specific relief sought and the sanctity of established legal procedures against arbitrary judicial substitutions.

Read the Full Article: Here

RAJAT KUMAR AND OTHERS VS S D ADARSH JAIN KANYA MAHA VIDYALAYA SADHAURA AND OTHERS, decided on 19-06-2026

Consumer Protection & Arbitration: SC Upholds Consumer Forum Jurisdiction Despite Arbitration Clauses

In a significant ruling for consumer law and arbitration, the Supreme Court has clarified that the existence of an arbitration clause in an agreement does not automatically oust the jurisdiction of consumer fora, especially once a consumer complaint has been admitted. The Court emphasized that remedies under the Consumer Protection Act are "in addition to and not in derogation of" other laws. Crucially, it affirmed that an allottee's acceptance of possession does not extinguish their right to seek compensation for prior deficiencies, such as delayed possession. This judgment is vital for real estate developers, cooperative societies, legal professionals, and consumer advocates, reinforcing the robust and independent role of consumer forums in dispute resolution.

Read the Full Article: Here

T.K.A. PADMANABHAN VS ABHIYAN COOPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, decided on 04-06-2026