Featured Case: Quashing of FIR for Rape on Pretext of Marriage: Abuse of Process and Ulterior Motives

This recent Supreme Court case highlights the crucial issue of abuse of process in filing FIRs. The court's decision sheds light on the circumstances under which an FIR can be quashed, offering valuable insights for legal professionals handling similar cases. The judgment underscores the importance of considering ulterior motives and the need to prevent the misuse of legal processes for personal vendetta.

Read the Full Article: Here

Surendra Khawse VS State of Madhya Pradesh & Anr., decided on 22-09-2025

Other Supreme Court Decisions You Might Find Interesting:

High Court's Review Jurisdiction in Judicial Officer Recruitment Challenged

This case clarifies the scope and limits of High Court review jurisdiction in the context of judicial officer recruitment. The Supreme Court's decision provides important guidance on the appropriate exercise of review powers and the standards for demonstrating demonstrable error.

Read the Full Article: Here

High Court of Madhya Pradesh & Anr. VS Jyotsna Dohalia & Anr., decided on 23-09-2025

Service Tax Liability on Airport Authority of India's Export Cargo Handling Services

This decision offers valuable clarification on the interpretation of Section 65 and 66 of the Finance Act, 1994, concerning service tax liability on airport services, specifically regarding export cargo handling. The ruling impacts the tax obligations of airport authorities.

Read the Full Article: Here

Airports Authority of India VS Commissioner of Service Tax, decided on 23-09-2025

Dismissal of Appeals Challenging Loan Recovery Order under SARFAESI Act

This case examines the principles of maintainability of appeals and public policy concerning repeated litigation related to loan recovery under the SARFAESI Act. The Supreme Court's decision provides important guidance on the limits of challenging court orders through multiple appeals.

Read the Full Article: Here

SATHEESH V.K. VS THE FEDERAL BANK LTD., decided on 23-09-2025

Withholding of Retiral Dues Due to Non-Vacated Government Residence: An Appeal Against High Court Judgment

This case addresses the critical issue of withholding retiral dues from government employees. The Supreme Court's affirmation of the employee's right to timely pension and gratuity clarifies the boundaries of justifiable deductions and emphasizes the legal nexus between retiral benefits and unrelated matters.

Read the Full Article: Here

Panchayat & Rural Development Department & Ors. VS Santosh Kumar Shrivastava, decided on 22-09-2025