Featured Case: Quashing of Tax Evasion Prosecution Following Settlement Commission Order

The Supreme Court's decision in Vijay Krishnaswami @ Krishnaswami Vijayakumar vs The Deputy Director of Income Tax (Investigation) offers crucial insights into the interpretation of Section 245H of the Income Tax Act, 1961, concerning the Settlement Commission's power to grant immunity from prosecution. The ruling clarifies the binding nature of departmental circulars and guidelines on the Revenue's initiation and continuation of prosecutions, highlighting the potential consequences of disregarding established procedures.

Read the Full Article: Here

VIJAY KRISHNASWAMI @ KRISHNASWAMI VIJAYAKUMAR VS THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INVESTIGATION), decided on 28-08-2025

Other Supreme Court Decisions You Might Find Interesting:

Removal of APPSC Member: Inquiry into Allegations of Misbehaviour

This case, President of India vs Mepung Tadar Bage, provides valuable clarification on the meaning of "misbehaviour" under Article 317 of the Constitution, particularly within the context of public service commissions. The Supreme Court's analysis of the evidence and the application of principles of individual versus collective responsibility offers significant implications for disciplinary actions against public officials.

Read the Full Article: Here

President of India VS Mepung Tadar Bage, decided on 28-08-2025

Tariff Dispute: KKK Hydro Power Limited vs. Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board

M/s. KKK Hydro Power Limited vs Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Limited and others sheds light on the intricacies of tariff disputes within the electricity sector. The Court's interpretation of Section 86(1)(b) of the Electricity Act, 2003, concerning unilateral PPA modifications, and its analysis of HPERC regulations, provide important guidance for power producers and regulatory bodies.

Read the Full Article: Here

M/s. KKK Hydro Power Limited VS Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Limited and others, decided on 29-08-2025

Dismissal of Police Constable: Procedural Fairness and Disciplinary Action

The case of State of Punjab and Others vs Ex. C. Satpal Singh offers a detailed examination of procedural fairness in disciplinary actions against police personnel. The Supreme Court's interpretation of Rule 16.2(1) of the Punjab Police Rules, 1934, and its clarification on the consideration of past misconduct, are valuable for understanding due process in such contexts.

Read the Full Article: Here

State of Punjab and Others VS Ex. C. Satpal Singh, decided on 29-08-2025

Overturning Dowry Harassment Conviction: Bhagwati Devi v. State of Uttarakhand

In SMT. BHAGWATI DEVI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND, the Supreme Court's careful review of evidence in a Section 498-A case provides crucial insights into the standards of proof required for dowry harassment convictions. The Court's emphasis on continuous or persistent harassment adds clarity to the application of this important legal provision.

Read the Full Article: Here

SMT. BHAGWATI DEVI VS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND, decided on 29-08-2025

Disciplinary Action Against CISF Constable: Challenge to Penalty for Misconduct

The Supreme Court's decision in CONST. AMAR SINGH VS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. reinforces the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice in disciplinary proceedings within the CISF. The Court's assessment of the appropriateness of the penalty based on the proven misconduct provides valuable guidance for similar cases.

Read the Full Article: Here

CONST. AMAR SINGH VS UNION OF INDIA & ORS., decided on 29-08-2025

Motor Vehicle Tax Exemption for Vehicles Used Exclusively on Private Premises

M/S. TARACHAND LOGISTIC SOLUTIONS LIMITED VS STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS. offers a nuanced interpretation of "public place" under the Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicle Taxation Act, 1963. The Court's analysis of the interplay between the state's taxation act and the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, is crucial for businesses operating within private industrial premises.

Read the Full Article: Here

M/S. TARACHAND LOGISTIC SOLUTIONS LIMITED VS STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS., decided on 29-08-2025