Featured Insight: Supreme Court Defines Telecom Spectrum Status in IBC

In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court has clarified that telecom spectrum, despite being listed as an asset in a Corporate Debtor's books, is a finite natural resource owned by the people and held in trust by the Union of India. This ruling significantly impacts Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) proceedings for Telecom Service Providers (TSPs), affirming that the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) cannot override the government's sovereign control over spectrum, nor can Department of Telecommunication (DoT) dues related to spectrum be simply written off through CIRP.

Read the Full Article: Here

STATE BANK OF INDIA VS UNION OF INDIA & ORS., decided on 13-02-2026

Other Critical Supreme Court Decisions You Might Find Interesting:

Navigating Custody: Parental Conduct and Foreign Court Orders Re-emphasized

The Supreme Court has reiterated that while a child's welfare is paramount in custody disputes, the conduct of parents, including disregard for foreign court orders and unilateral removal of children, and even the child's expressed inclination, are crucial factors that must be thoroughly considered. The High Court's failure to weigh these aspects led to a remand for fresh consideration.

Read the Full Article: Here

MOHTASHEM BILLAH MALIK VS SANA AFTAB, decided on 04-02-2026

Ending Exploitation: Contractual Instructors Awarded Fair Remuneration and Arrears

In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court deemed long-serving contractual instructors as 'de facto' full-time teachers, condemning their continuous engagement on exploitative terms. The Court directed the State of U.P. to pay a revised honorarium of Rs. 17,000/- per month from 2017-2018 onwards, along with all arrears, emphasizing that arbitrary pay scales or reductions constitute 'Begar' (forced labor) and violate constitutional principles.

Read the Full Article: Here

U.P. JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL COUNCIL INSTRUCTOR WELFARE ASSOCIATION VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS., decided on 04-02-2026

Arbitration and IBC: High Court’s Jurisdiction Limited in Appointing Substitute Arbitrators

The Supreme Court clarified that a High Court's power under Section 15(2) of the Arbitration Act, 1996, is limited to appointing a substitute arbitrator, and does not extend to nullifying prior arbitral proceedings or orders, even if they occurred during an IBC moratorium. The ruling reinforces the principle of minimal judicial intervention and the continuity of arbitration proceedings.

Read the Full Article: Here

ANKHIM HOLDINGS PVT. LTD. & ANR. VS ZAVERI CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD., decided on 04-02-2026

No Leniency for Lethargy: State's Inordinate Delays in Litigation Dismissed

The Supreme Court took a firm stance against the State of Odisha's "utterly lethargic, tardy and indolent" approach to litigation, dismissing its Special Leave Petition due to inordinate and unexplained delays spanning over a decade. This judgment underscores a stricter judicial trend, moving away from past liberal approaches for governmental entities, emphasizing that 'bureaucratic indifference' is no longer an acceptable excuse for gross delays.

Read the Full Article: Here

STATE OF ODISHA & ORS. VS. MANAGING COMMITTEE OF NAMATARA GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL, decided on 09-02-2026

Anticipatory Bail: Enduring Protection and Procedure for New Charges

The Supreme Court has clarified that anticipatory bail, once granted, should ordinarily not be time-limited or cease upon the filing of a charge sheet, aligning with the Sushila Aggarwal precedent. Furthermore, it outlined that when new non-bailable offences are added, the accused can seek fresh bail for those specific charges, ensuring due process is maintained.

Read the Full Article: Here

SUMIT VS STATE OF U P & ANR., decided on 09-02-2026

Land Acquisition: Limitation Act Applies to Appeals for Fair Compensation

The Supreme Court has ruled that Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, allowing for condonation of delay, is applicable to appeals filed under Section 74 of the Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. This ensures a liberal and pragmatic approach to ensure justice in land acquisition cases, given the welfare objectives of the Act.

Read the Full Article: Here

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER VS M/S S.V. GLOBAL MILL LIMITED, decided on 09-02-2026

Forest Evictions: Due Process Essential for Long-Standing Inhabitants

Balancing environmental protection with the rights of long-standing inhabitants, the Supreme Court affirmed that eviction from reserved forests must adhere to strict procedural safeguards. The State of Assam's evolved policy, requiring notice, opportunity for hearing, and a speaking order before eviction, was accepted as compliant with due process, emphasizing lawful means over arbitrary action.

Read the Full Article: Here

ABDUL KHALEK & OTHERS VS THE STATE OF ASSAM & OTHERS, decided on 10-02-2026

Family Disputes: No Summary Rejection for Suits Alleging Fraud in Partition Deeds

The Supreme Court has overturned the summary rejection of a civil suit challenging a family partition deed and conciliation award, emphasizing that allegations of coercion, undue influence, and misrepresentation require proper adjudication through a trial. The ruling clarifies the limited scope of Order VII Rule 11 CPC and the distinction between an executing court's and a civil court's jurisdiction in such complex family matters.

Read the Full Article: Here

J. Muthurajan & Anr. VS S. Vaikundarajan & Ors., decided on 10-02-2026

Judicial Review: High Court Must Undertake Comprehensive Review, Not Single-Point Consideration

The Supreme Court set aside a High Court order that quashed a Tribunal's decision and remanded a case for fresh consideration on a solitary point, without addressing other crucial issues like natural justice violations or the justification of the Tribunal's findings. The ruling underscores the imperative for courts to undertake comprehensive review, ensuring all claims and defenses are considered to facilitate clarity and finality in legal proceedings.

Read the Full Article: Here

Hemlata Eknath Pise VS Shubham Bahu-uddeshiya Sanstha Waddhamna & Ors., decided on 11-02-2026

Gratuity for Heavy Water Plant Employees: CCS (Pension) Rules Apply, Not PG Act

The Supreme Court has ruled that employees of the Heavy Water Plant, a unit of the Department of Atomic Energy, are Central Government servants governed by the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, for gratuity benefits. This decision confirms their exclusion from the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, due to the specific statutory provision for government employees.

Read the Full Article: Here

N. MANOHARAN & ORS. VS THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER & ORS., decided on 11-02-2026

Bail Cancelled for Forged Degree Racket: Suppression of Facts Vitiates Relief

In a strong rebuke, the Supreme Court cancelled the bail of an accused involved in a forged degree racket, citing deliberate suppression of material facts and extensive criminal antecedents. The Court emphasized that obtaining discretionary relief through deceit amounts to an abuse of the legal process and called for a standardized disclosure framework for bail applications across all courts to enhance transparency and integrity.

Read the Full Article: Here

ZEBA KHAN VS STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS, decided on 11-02-2026

IBC and Limitation: Acknowledgment of Debt in Balance Sheets Extends Period

The Supreme Court upheld the admission of a CIRP application, affirming that acknowledgments of debt in a corporate debtor's balance sheets and debt restructuring agreements are sufficient to extend the limitation period under Section 18 of the Limitation Act. This decision provides crucial clarity for financial creditors seeking to initiate insolvency proceedings.

Read the Full Article: Here

B. PRASHANTH HEGDE VS State Bank of India & M/s. Metal Closure Pvt. Ltd., decided on 12-02-2026

Disability Pension Arrears: Ex-Servicemen's Vested Right Unrestricted by Limitation

The Supreme Court has emphatically declared that disability pension is a vested right, not a bounty, and its arrears for ex-servicemen cannot be restricted by limitation or laches. Upholding the "judgment in rem" principle, the Court directed the Union of India, as a model employer, to pay broad banding benefits and arrears, with interest, from specified cut-off dates, rather than forcing individual litigation.

Read the Full Article: Here

UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY & ORS. VS SGT GIRISH KUMAR AND ORS. ETC., decided on 12-02-2026

Educational Qualifications: SET Must Be Subject-Specific for Teaching Appointments

The Supreme Court, through a purposive interpretation of the Kerala Education Rules, clarified that the State Eligibility Test (SET) qualification for Higher Secondary School Teacher (HSST) appointments must be in the concerned subject. The ruling emphasizes contextual statutory interpretation to prevent absurdity and maintain educational standards, dismissing an appellant who held a SET in a different subject.

Read the Full Article: Here

ZUBAIR. P VS STATE OF KERALA & ORS., decided on 13-02-2026

Sports Governance: BCCI Framework, Not Athletics Norms, for Cricket Associations

The Supreme Court clarified that governance reforms established for athletics (S. Nithya judgments) are not directly applicable to district cricket associations, which operate under the specific regulatory framework set by the BCCI. While not mandating identical structures, the Court urged State Associations to promote transparency and professionalism in district bodies, recognizing sports as vital 'institutions of national life'.

Read the Full Article: Here

THE TIRUCHIRAPPALLI DISTRICT CRICKET ASSOCIATION VS ANNA NAGAR CRICKET CLUB & ANR. ETC., decided on 13-02-2026

Absconding Accused: No Automatic Anticipatory Bail on Co-Accused Acquittal

The Supreme Court set aside an order granting anticipatory bail to an absconding accused, emphasizing that an absconder is generally not entitled to such relief. The Court clarified that the acquittal of co-accused does not automatically create a ground for parity, as the prosecution cannot present evidence against an absconding party, especially when there's a history of non-cooperation and witness intimidation.

Read the Full Article: Here

BALMUKUND SINGH GAUTAM VS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANR., decided on 13-02-2026

Deregulation's Impact: Cement Black Marketing Conviction Set Aside

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants convicted for cement black marketing under the Essential Commodities Act, ruling that the prosecution was unsustainable. The Court found that cement had been substantially decontrolled by the Central Government prior to the alleged offense, thus rendering the regulatory orders on which the charges were based non-existent. This case highlights the critical importance of verifying the legal validity of regulations at the time of an alleged offense.

Read the Full Article: Here

MANOJ & PRAKASH VS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR., decided on 13-02-2026