Featured Insight: CoC's Commercial Wisdom in IBC Reaffirmed by Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has delivered a crucial judgment in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of M/s Bhushan Power and Steel Limited (BPSL), reinforcing the 'commercial wisdom' of the Committee of Creditors (CoC). This ruling provides significant clarity on the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) framework, addressing key aspects like the CoC's continuing role post-approval, the handling of implementation delays due to external factors (like ED attachments), the treatment of operational creditor payments, and the distribution of CIRP-generated profits (EBITDA). Professionals in corporate law, insolvency, finance, and M&A will find this judgment particularly insightful for navigating complex corporate restructuring and understanding the limited scope of judicial intervention.

Read the Full Article: Here

KALYANI TRANSCO VS M/S BHUSHAN POWER AND STEEL LIMITED AND OTHERS, decided on 26-09-2025

Other Supreme Court Decisions You Might Find Interesting:

Judicial Eligibility Rules Challenged: SC's Exceptional Directive for Telangana Appointments

This judgment deals with eligibility criteria for judicial appointments, specifically interpreting 'High Court' in state judicial service rules. It highlights the Supreme Court's pragmatic approach in balancing strict rule adherence with exceptional circumstances to ensure qualified candidates are not unduly penalized, particularly for public service roles. Relevant for legal professionals, public administration, and those involved in recruitment policy.

Read the Full Article: Here

USHA KIRAN KSHATRI AND ORS. VS THE STATE OF TELANGANA & ORS., decided on 26-09-2025

Absence of Intent to Kill: Conviction Modified in Triple Murder Case

A significant ruling for criminal law practitioners, this case clarifies the distinction between murder (Section 302 IPC) and culpable homicide not amounting to murder (Section 304 Part I IPC). The Court emphasized the absence of 'intention to kill' despite multiple deaths, focusing on the nature of weapons used (blunt side) and the context of a sudden quarrel. It underlines the critical role of *mens rea* in determining criminal culpability.

Read the Full Article: Here

RAGHAV PRASHAD AND OTHERS VS STATE OF U.P., decided on 26-09-2025

Insurance Policy Validity: SC Allows Partial Recovery from Vehicle Owner Despite Lapses

This case offers crucial insights for insurance companies and legal professionals dealing with motor accident claims. While upholding the payout to claimants due to the insurer's procedural missteps in proving fraud, the Supreme Court permitted partial recovery from the vehicle owner, highlighting the need for insurers to be diligent in establishing fraud during initial proceedings and the Court's equity-based approach.

Read the Full Article: Here

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. VS NARAYAN SINGH & ORS., decided on 26-09-2025

Motor Accident Compensation: SC Rejects Workmen's Compensation Act Parameters

A vital judgment for personal injury and motor accident claims, reiterating that once a claimant chooses to seek compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, courts cannot apply parameters from the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. It underscores the distinct nature of remedies and the importance of adhering to the elected statutory framework.

Read the Full Article: Here

MOHAMMED MASOOD VS THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR., decided on 26-09-2025

Fatal Accident Claim Rejected: SC Affirms Lack of Proof for Accident & Vehicle Involvement

This ruling emphasizes the importance of credible evidence in motor accident claims, particularly in hit-and-run scenarios. It highlights that unexplained delays in FIR, suspicious witness testimonies, and lack of corroboration can lead to the rejection of claims, even when based on the 'preponderance of probabilities.' A crucial reminder for both claimants and insurers on evidentiary standards.

Read the Full Article: Here

Rajamma & Ors. VS M/s. Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr., decided on 26-09-2025

Arbitral Award Set Aside: Unilateral Waiver and Discriminatory Treatment Violate Natural Justice

A landmark decision for arbitration law, this judgment reinforces the limited but crucial scope of judicial intervention in arbitral awards. It clarifies that awards can be set aside if they violate the fundamental policy of Indian law or natural justice, such as through discriminatory treatment of parties or unilateral rewriting of contractual terms. Essential reading for arbitration practitioners and contract managers.

Read the Full Article: Here

SEPCO ELECTRIC POWER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION VS GMR KAMALANGA ENERGY LTD., decided on 26-09-2025

Murder Acquittal Upheld: SC Cites Insufficient and Unreliable Evidence in Rajasthan Case

This criminal law judgment underscores the high standard of proof required in cases based on circumstantial evidence. The Supreme Court upheld an acquittal, finding that the prosecution failed to establish motive, 'last seen' theory, and recoveries with reliable evidence, emphasizing issues like delayed witness testimony and inadmissible CDRs. It serves as a strong precedent on the importance of robust evidence in criminal convictions.

Read the Full Article: Here

State of Rajasthan VS Bhanwar Singh Etc. Etc., decided on 26-09-2025

Motor Accident Claim Survives to LRs: Enhanced Compensation for Disabled Deceased

This ruling is crucial for motor accident claims, particularly for cases involving disabled victims who subsequently pass away. It clarifies that personal injury claims survive to legal representatives under Section 166(5) of the MV Act, regardless of the cause of death, and provides guidance on income assessment for skilled workers without documentation and appropriate multiplier application for loss to the estate.

Read the Full Article: Here

Dhannalal Alias Dhanraj (Dead) Thr. LRs. Vs Nasir Khan and Ors., decided on 26-09-2025

Anti-Corruption Case: SC Quashes FIR Against In-Laws Citing Vague Allegations

A significant judgment on criminal procedure, this case reiterates the High Court's power to quash FIRs that lack sufficient material connection to an accused, even in anti-corruption matters. It emphasizes that vague or general allegations without specific supporting evidence against an individual cannot sustain criminal proceedings, safeguarding individuals from unwarranted prosecution.

Read the Full Article: Here

SANJAY D. JAIN & ORS. VS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS., decided on 26-09-2025

Competition Act: SC Clarifies Adequacy of Notice and Upholds Behavioral Remedies

This landmark ruling in competition law clarifies that a separate show-cause notice for proposed penalties on individuals is not strictly required. The forwarding of the DG's report, which implicates individuals, along with a request for financial details, constitutes sufficient notice. It also reinforces the CCI's power to impose behavioral remedies on individuals to effectively curb anti-competitive practices. Crucial for compliance officers and competition law practitioners.

Read the Full Article: Here

Competition Commission of India VS Kerala Film Exhibitors Federation & Ors., decided on 26-09-2025